How to have impossible conversations
By Peter Boghossian and James A. Lindsay
- Impossible conversations can be productive when they become collaborative
- Coercion is a bad way to change somebody's mind
- Conversation is inherently collaborative, and it creates an opportunity for people to reconsider what they believe and thus potentially change how they act
- If you want to change someone's mind, you have to listen to them
- People are more likely to accept self-generated ideas than messages delivered by others
- Remember, everyone finds it deeply satisfying to be heard
- It's easier to talk openly and air disagreements when you build rapport
- Break the ice with obvious questions about names, occupations
- Avoid parallel talk
- This is when someone tells you about their vacation in Cuba, and you take this as a cue to start talking about your time in Cuba. Asking someone questions about their holiday is an easy and effective way to build rapport.
- Using their stories to talk about your life, by contrast, is a great way to undermine this connection
- To change someone's mind, you must first plant a seed of doubt
- Unread library effect
- Borrowing books from library but never actually reading them, and assuming that we've assimilated the knowledge in all unread books
- Modeling ignorance
- If you want somebody to recognize the limits of their knowledge, pretend to be ignorant.
- Well, either your partner will realize that he actually doesn't know that much, or, if he really is an expert, you will be rewarded with an interesting lesson
- Unread library effect
- To foster mutual respect and openness during arguments, use Rapoport's Rules
- Once your position is misrepresented by someone, your real views no longer matter. Instead, she's attacking a straw man - a misrepresentation that's easier to defeat than your real opinion
- Rapoport's Rules
- You must attempt to rephrase your partner's position in your own words. Do it as clearly and fairly as you can. You want them to say, "Wow, I wish I'd put it like that."
- You must list every point of agreement between you and your conversation partner
- You should tell your partner what you've learned from their argument (pro-social modeling)
- You may voice disagreements only after you've gone through the previous three rules
- If evidential arguments aren't helping, try posing logical questions instead
- What evidence can change your mind?
- Minimal encouragers - Small signals that discreetly inform the speaker you're listening like Yeah, I see, OK
- Actionable advice
- Identify the source of conflict by listening to your "moral dialect"
- Smile
- Remember someone's name
- Listen to them
- Think about what they want
- Don't make your success come at the price of theirs
- Don't tell others they are wrong
- Get to understand (and appreciate) why they think as they do